Those of us on the business side of the early market equation often lament about inventions that focus on "what it is vs. why it matters" ...don't tell me whatcha got...tell me why it matters to someone.
But having spent my 20+ years working with ideas in early markets, this is a balancing Act! Big Time...it's not always clear when you're developing the next generation application, vaccine, therapy, etc. who will care and why will they care -- we need a decent amount of this thinking ahead about what matters. It's the basis for new discoveries and breakthrough ideas and without it, we'd be relegated to a world of incrementalism...yuck!
Alec Saunders post talks about the Voice 2.0 evolution and how this market will evolve into a market of choice for voice consumers -- next generation services will become more about "what's in it for me vs. what's in it for the service provider". This evolution will turn this market on its ear and put the power in the hands of the customer (or the subscriber as the service providers call us). I'm reminded of Chris Anderson's book, "The Long Tail" which Alec also points to. In essence 'The Long Tail' suggests that markets of tomorrow will be made up of small communities of users and that the opportunity will lie in the ability of new ideas to do an exceptional job of satisfying these "schools of fish" as I call them. No longer will the world be about "masses and market leaders" -- it will be communities and schools of fish -- speak'in my language!!
The future of Voice is exciting - choice, communities, and customization -- what could be a better value proposition for the end customer -- and even more interesting to watch will be the way it turns the service provider market on its ear - a new business model will emerge - one that is focused on "what's in it for me". This industry is a great example of the power of new ideas to influence an ecosystem and ultimately impact the way value is exchanged.
And all of this thanks to those inventors who dared to dream about what's next vs. simply what now.
The key to all of this choice is timing -- can the ingenious startups with ideas that point to a future market survive while waiting for market. That's the $64,000 question -- and the one that has been testing the entrepreneurial mettle of inventors since time began.
My advice to these inventors is to find a point in the future and aim for it, but to also be focused on delivering value today -- become a solution to a problem that exists today that people see as real -- it may not be the uber solution you're going for in future, but it needs to be something that people will latch on to now -- you need to make it real today for validation of your idea. Look for a derivative of your idea that could legitimize what you're doing and get people interested in you - and don't be surprised if your engineers and scientists see if as boring and simple -- often, the solutions to problems are not the ones that have all the bells and whistles - they're just that -- SOLUTIONS to PROBLEMS!!.
Wise inventors have learned that "making it real" is the key to staying power. Or lots of VC money -- but if you're short on that like most entrepreneurs, then creating pockets of value along your path to the big vision is the way to go.
Enjoy Your Journey!
Wendy
Wendy Kennedy
author/advisor/lady with the fipcharts!
www.wendykennedy.com













